<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MattJMcD via the Internet &#187; monitoring</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattjmcd.com/tag/monitoring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattjmcd.com</link>
	<description>Ideas and Actions from Matt J McDonald</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 02:12:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Maybe They Aren&#8217;t Talking About You</title>
		<link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/02/maybe-they-arent-talking-about-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/02/maybe-they-arent-talking-about-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monitoring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattjmcd.com/?p=645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a common in social media to hear: &#8220;People are talking! About you! Better listen!&#8221;, but I&#8217;m wondering if that&#8217;s always the case. The entire &#8220;People Are Talking&#8221; idea certainly makes sense for bigger brands. Sure people are talking about Coca-Cola, and Nike, and Ford, but what about Every Man Jack? What about Optimum Nutrition? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a common in social media to hear: &#8220;People are talking! About you! Better listen!&#8221;, but I&#8217;m wondering if that&#8217;s always the case.</p>
<p>The entire &#8220;People Are Talking&#8221; idea certainly makes sense for bigger brands. Sure people are talking about Coca-Cola, and Nike, and Ford, but what about <a target="new" href="http://www.everymanjack.com">Every Man Jack</a>? What about <a target="new" href="http://www.optimumnutrition.com">Optimum Nutrition</a>? They&#8217;re both (very good) national brands, but there isn&#8217;t a lot of online chatter around either.</p>
<p>What about your brand? How many people are talking about you?</p>
<p><strong>My point is this:</strong> Unless you&#8217;re a small Mom &#038; Pop operation (and sometimes even then), people are probably talking about you. However, unless you&#8217;re a bigger brand, odds are they aren&#8217;t saying that much. </p>
<p>In the case that you&#8217;re not Microsoft, you probably don&#8217;t need a team dedicated to &#8220;listening&#8221; on the internet, you probably don&#8217;t need <a target="new" href="http://www.radian6.com/cms/home">Radian6</a> (but if you&#8217;re big enough, they&#8217;re awesome). Empowering your employees to take pride in their brand and respond online should be enough.</p>
<p>And hey, if you&#8217;re not happy with the quiet? Just <a target="new" href="http://paulisakson.typepad.com/planning/2009/01/how-to-leverage-social-media.html">take some advice from Paul Isakson</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/02/maybe-they-arent-talking-about-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

