<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MattJMcD via the Internet &#187; user experience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattjmcd.com/tag/user-experience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattjmcd.com</link>
	<description>Ideas and Actions from Matt J McDonald</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 02:12:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Importance of Does versus Says</title>
		<link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/12/the-importance-of-does-versus-says/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/12/the-importance-of-does-versus-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alan wolk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattjmcd.com/?p=1008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More great stuff from Sir Alan Wolk today (knighthood mine) in the form of these two really good charts. Take a quick look, and then we&#8217;ll talk. I think the biggest thing here is the move from passive to active. With ads (typically) we are passive recipients of a neatly packaged &#8220;moment&#8221; designed to elicit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More great stuff from <a href="http://tangerinetoad.blogspot.com/">Sir Alan Wolk</a> today (knighthood mine) in the form of these two really good charts.</p>
<p>Take a quick look, and then we&#8217;ll talk. </p>
<p><a href="http://tangerinetoad.blogspot.com/2009/12/how-we-judge.html"><img alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_VJkQmNthxnU/SyZgRj_jwpI/AAAAAAAABtk/eKlVV15mbGs/s400/Chart.001.jpg" title="How We Judge Ads" class="aligncenter" width="400" height="300" /></a><br />
<a href="http://tangerinetoad.blogspot.com/2009/12/how-we-judge.html"><img alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_VJkQmNthxnU/SyZgYY12zTI/AAAAAAAABts/QAPzKPmE15w/s400/Chart.002.jpg" title="How We Judge Websites" class="aligncenter" width="400" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>I think the biggest thing here is the move from passive to active. With ads (typically) we are passive recipients of a neatly packaged &#8220;moment&#8221; designed to elicit some sort of emotional response or purchase intent. With websites, and most digital instances, we&#8217;re being given the opportunity to experience something, and how we do so is entirely of our own choosing. </p>
<p>You&#8217;ve probably heard that the medium is the message. I think that&#8217;s only half right.</p>
<p>Maybe the experience is the message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/12/the-importance-of-does-versus-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital + Tactile</title>
		<link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/09/digital-tactile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/09/digital-tactile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tacticle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattjmcd.com/?p=680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s something interesting that I&#8217;ve noticed lately. There&#8217;s this continual push to have everything digital. Digital TV, mp3&#8242;s, e-books, movies on your iPod, etc. It seems as if the goal is to move from physical copies of things to only having them &#8220;exist&#8221; digitally. That being said, I don&#8217;t think actual books are going to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s something interesting that I&#8217;ve noticed lately.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s this continual push to have everything digital. Digital TV, mp3&#8242;s, e-books, movies on your iPod, etc. It seems as if the goal is to move from physical copies of things to only having them &#8220;exist&#8221; digitally. That being said, I don&#8217;t think actual books are going to disappear anytime soon&#8230; but still.</p>
<p>The interesting thing is that even as we&#8217;re digitizing everything, we still want to interact with it in the &#8220;traditional&#8221; sense. We want to be able to touch, pull, push, drag, and draw. Would the iPhone be as successful without the multi-touch functionality? Maybe, but it would certainly be very different. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5369493/leaked-courier-video-shows-how-well-actually-use-it">Look at Microsoft&#8217;s Courier</a>. Purely digital content, but interacted with in the same way as a traditional journal. </p>
<p>Where are we heading with this? <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwVBzx0LMNQ">Minority Report anyone</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/09/digital-tactile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Point B Is A State Of Mind</title>
		<link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/01/point-b-is-a-state-of-mind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/01/point-b-is-a-state-of-mind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[point b]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattjmcd.com/?p=576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was thinking the other day about the informational search process on the web. Basically I thought about two types of searches that people preform, and that lead me to an idea about Point B&#8230; The first type we&#8217;ll call a &#8220;closed query&#8221; because it has a definite answer. These are questions like: What&#8217;s the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking the other day about the informational search process on the web. Basically I thought about two types of searches that people preform, and that lead me to an idea about Point B&#8230;</p>
<p>The first type we&#8217;ll call a &#8220;closed query&#8221; because it has a definite answer. These are questions like:</p>
<ul>
<li>What&#8217;s the number of the nearest Chinese restaurant?</li>
<li>Who was the lead singer of Twisted Sister?</li>
<li>What&#8217;s the MSRP of a new Toyota Camry?</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.mattjmcd.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/closedquery.jpg"><img src="http://www.mattjmcd.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/closedquery.jpg" alt="" title="closedquery" width="320" height="175" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-577" /></a></p>
<p>The closed query is very straightforward, easy to define, and can usually be answered by Google or Wikipedia in a few minutes. Not much else going on. <strong>Unless you&#8217;re planning on a street fight for internet search supremacy, these kinds of queries really shouldn&#8217;t worry you.</strong> Just make sure that you&#8217;re information is easy to find (and be &#8220;find&#8221; I mean &#8220;be indexed&#8221;).</p>
<p>The other (more interesting) type of query is the &#8220;open query&#8221; and unlike the closed query, there&#8217;s no definite singular answer here. Some examples:</p>
<ul>
<li>How can I learn to break dance?</li>
<li>What are some easy salmon recipes?</li>
<li>What is the meaning of life?</li>
</ul>
<p>And unlike closed queries, open queries aren&#8217;t linear. They look more like this.<br />
<img src="http://www.mattjmcd.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/openquery.jpg" alt="" title="openquery" width="500" height="333" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-601" /><br />
As you can see, open queries are more involved. However, the key difference isn&#8217;t the amount of information, or the number of points. The key difference is that there is no definite Point B. <strong>Point B is a state of mind. </strong></p>
<p>If you set out determined to know more about break dancing, when have you achieved that goal? Unlike in closed queries, where the answer is always &#8220;Philadelphia&#8221; or &#8220;19.99&#8243;, your level of understanding that characterizes your Point B may be a completely different level than mine. <strong>The other major difference is that Point B is not the end. The Point B you&#8217;ve arrived at today may be different than your Point B two weeks from now.</strong></p>
<p>So what does this mean? Well for starters, unless you&#8217;re answering a closed query, <strong>you need to stop thinking of your content as a destination and more as a part of the process</strong>. I understand the pressure for better time-on-site, page views, etc. but really, shouldn&#8217;t we be focused on providing information someone is looking for and then sending them on their way to learn more? </p>
<p>Who would you think more favorably of? A site where you spend 10 minutes trying to find what you&#8217;re looking for and eventually give up or a site where you spend 2 minutes learning something and then move on to the next resource they suggest?</p>
<p>There should be no dead-ends on the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/01/point-b-is-a-state-of-mind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

